what are the arguements for?(part2)

Also, Some people argue that Law enforcers should be reined in. They should be controlled to a certain extinct and should be watched on the regular. For instance, when the police put on their sirens when there is no actual emergency or crime to attend, they just want to avoid traffic. That is dangerous because some people wont move out the way in future purposes when there is a real emergency. Also, police take advantage of their fire arms and use them when they're not neccessary. That has been a major growing argument with the common people and law enforcers. In one case Sean Bell was shot 50 times by police in front of a night club in queens,NY over a misunderstanding. They thought the brush he had in his pocket for his hair was a gun and they opened fire on him 50 times and to make the situation worse, he was African-American and was killed. The shooting outraged thousands mostly the black community and it became national news to police misconduct as a epidemic. People argue that employers arent strict on who they hire into the force and that is way all this is going on.

police misconduct; What are the arguements for?

There are good arguments on both sides on police misconduct. On one side, people believe that police need to send out a message that crime and unruly behavior is criminal and will not be tolerated. Other argue that the use of tazers,batons,spray,and handguns are uncalled for and unjustified. Also people argue about how the police handle protest. They push away protestors who have the right of free voice. They even resort to high-pressure hoses and use tear gas to keep em controlled. Personally, I feel that some methods the police use are unruly. I understand that the police are protecting the society and as well as theirselves but the violence is to much. Some criminals are hard to take down and you might need a little bit more of assistance. I only agree with the spray and tazers. Everything else is not justified and does not give the rights for the human-being, whether they are in the right ir wrong

source; http://www.helium.com/items/811943-understanding-opposing-viewpoints-on-police-brutality

police misconduct

Police Misconduct has been a growing epidemic in the United States. Police take advantage of their power as law enforcers in which they do not follow the laws they enforce. As a human, you must follow all laws no matter what. Some citizens experience police brutallity, in which the police take advantage of police procedures, in some cases aren't neccessary. One Very popular case that caught the medias' attention on police brutality is the rodney king case.
In the rodney king case, a man by the name of rodney king was savagely beat by a number of LA police. On March 3,1991, King was speed driving intoxicated and was pulled over.Their boots, billy clubs, and Tasers, beat the 25 year-old into the history books. It was uneccessary for the police to beat him for a such thing and he did not resist arrest. that was a form a police brutality and racial discrimination in the police work force. Out of all the police cops that beat him only four were acquitted. Both the force and the federal government didnt follow the procedures for such things to happen again. they should have made an example out of it to educate the minds of those who plan on doing things like that.